Are The Gates of Hell Locked From The Inside?

If someone from Hell was allowed a trip to visit Heaven,
would they stay?

If someone from earth was allowed to visit Heaven,
would they want to go there when they die?

You may think the answers would both be “Obviously, yes!”

You may be shocked.

You could be wrong.

I originally wrote this back in October, 2012.  It involves a court case that was going on at the time.  I checked up on it this week.  It’s still going!  When you see what the case is about – you’ll see why the answer to the title question is absolutely yes.  And why some (maybe many?) would surely turn down the opportunity to stay in Heaven.

 So – here’s the original, with updates in rust colored italics.

 The gates of Hell are locked from the inside.

This line is part of the description of C. S. Lewis’ book – The Great Divorce. The entire text is:

What if anyone in Hell could take a bus trip to Heaven and stay there forever if they wanted to?

In The Great Divorce C. S. Lewis again employs his formidable talent for fable and allegory. The writer finds himself in Hell boarding a bus bound for Heaven. The amazing opportunity is that anyone who wants to stay in Heaven, can. This is the starting point for an extraordinary meditation upon good and evil, grace and judgment. Lewis’s revolutionary idea is the discovery that the gates of Hell are locked from the inside. In Lewis’s own words, “If we insist on keeping Hell (or even earth) we shall not see Heaven: if we accept Heaven we shall not be able to retain even the smallest and most intimate souvenirs of Hell.

This is a great book.
I really hope to have time to put more on it up on the site.  Maybe do a class on it.

Anyway – This book came to mind when I was reading an article about – of all things – Texas cheerleaders. But more on that story in a while.

As I was searching the web for the entire text quoted above –
I came across a whole bunch of comments about the book.
Some were obviously positive –
talking about the amazing insight into the choice that we have between Heaven and Hell –
and what that would be like.

Others obviously were very negative and / or disagree with this conclusion.
One of them is –

Lewis’s belief that “the doors of hell are locked from the inside” has really been troubling me. I really don’t understand how this could be true. I know that Lewis is trying to make the point that a person’s unwillingness to submit themselves to God is what put them in hell, and I agree. But can we really assume that is what is keeping them there? I think if these people saw Jesus face to face and he said “I never knew you” they would be struck by Christ’s glory and know for certain that they had missed it. I think they will realize that the sovereign God of the universe truly exists and that surrendering their self-will for His service would have been definitely worth the sacrifice. But it will be too late. If hell truly is a lake of fire and a place with weeping a gnashing of teeth like the bible says it is, I don’t think people will “enjoy forever the horrible freedom they have demanded. I think it will be horrible, but I don’t think there will be enjoyment or freedom.

I’m guessing this statement was made by a Christian.  Someone who already has accepted Jesus. Someone who already realizes the significance of the choices already made.

But C. S. Lewis is saying that the gates are locked, not by God, but by the residents of Hell themselves.  So I tend to think that many Christians can’t really relate to the concept of not wanting to be with God.  For some – maybe they forgot how they used to be before making the decision to follow Jesus.  I still remember.  I think it helps to remember – because then we can better relate to, and hopefully help, those who haven’t yet decided.

I’ve known people with three different reactions to God’s Word – The Bible:

•  Some believe it is really from God – and try to live by it.
•  Some think it’s a nice story – but that’s it – just some old stories and tales.
•  Others totally reject it – lies, lies and more lies.

Some people are too “into themselves” to have any interest in God.

Others think they are strong enough to take care of themselves and don’t need anything else.

Others seem to be perfectly happy thinking that life is just a random / short experience and then there’s nothing after that.

Some think they would have to live a “boring” life if they did what God wanted.

Still others are having what they think is too much fun to even want to really think about God.

The one thing all of these people have in common is that they don’t want to have anything to do with God.

The other thing they have in common –
God isn’t going to force them to have anything to do with Him.
Salvation is a gift – it’s not something that’s shoved down our throats whether we want it or not.

What some of us may have a hard time realizing is that people with attitudes like this can actually reach a point where they’re quite “happy and content” with life as they know it. Notice – I put quotes around “happy and content” – because it’s happiness and contentment as they know it. Never having allowed themselves to experience anything else – they assume that whatever they now have in life is as good as it’s going to get.

In Chapter 3 of The Great Divorce – Lewis has the following exchange between a person who has been taken on a “bus ride” from Hell to Heaven – and has a choice to stay in Heaven or return to Hell on “the bus”.

‘This is simply ridiculous,’ said a voice in my ear. One of the quieter and more respectable ghosts had sidled up to me. ‘There must be some mismanagement,’ he continued. ‘What’s the sense of allowing all that riff-raff to float about here all day? Look at them. They’re not enjoying it. They’d be far happier at home. They don’t even know what to do.’

‘I don’t know very well myself,’ said I. ‘What does one do?’

This visitor from Hell is looking right at Heaven –
sitting at the entrance –
with a view of the “entrance” to Heaven –
and a view of “the bus” that would take him back to Hell.
He’s concerned that he won’t know what to do in Heaven.

Is this really any different from what happens here on earth?  I’ve known people who insist on doing what they want, even knowing that it’s wrong, but hoping that God has a “sense of humor”.  How God having a sense of humor will help them, I can’t imagine.  I fully expect that He does have a sense of humor.  But not in the way they’re hoping.  

We Christians are called to be light unto the world – as in Matthew 5:13-16 –

Salt and Light

Mt 5:13 “You are the salt of the earth. But if the salt loses its saltiness, how can it be made salty again? It is no longer good for anything, except to be thrown out and trampled by men.

Mt 5:14 “You are the light of the world. A city on a hill cannot be hidden.

Mt 5:15 Neither do people light a lamp and put it under a bowl. Instead they put it on its stand, and it gives light to everyone in the house.

Mt 5:16 In the same way, let your light shine before men, that they may see your good deeds and praise your Father in heaven.

But – does that mean everyone is going to see the light –
and become Christians because of that?

No – obviously not.

For various reasons – some choose to not be with God.

Not surprisingly – Jesus said this would happen.
The verses below come from when Jesus was teaching Nicodemus, who was one of the Jewish Pharisees – in John 3:16-21 –

Jn 3:16 “For God so loved the world that he gave his one and only Son, that whoever believes in him shall not perish but have eternal life. For God did not send his Son into the world to condemn the world, but to save the world through him. Whoever believes in him is not condemned, but whoever does not believe stands condemned already because he has not believed in the name of God’s one and only Son. This is the verdict: Light has come into the world, but men loved darkness instead of light because their deeds were evil. Everyone who does evil hates the light, and will not come into the light for fear that his deeds will be exposed. But whoever lives by the truth comes into the light, so that it may be seen plainly that what he has done has been done through God.”

And here we see yet another reason people stay away from God –

They think that whatever they’ve done is so bad they can’t possibly be forgiven.

Considering who we already know Jesus has forgiven –
that really shouldn’t be a problem.

For example – in Luke 23:34 –

Luke 23:34 Jesus said, “Father, forgive them, for they do not know what they are doing.”

…is what Jesus said as He was dying on the cross.
He even forgave the very people who were either killing Him or enjoying the sight.

But some will still feel that what they’ve done is too bad to be forgiven –
and will reject the offer of salvation.

Which now brings us to the article – Texas cheerleaders can keep Christian banners, for now, judge rules – from The issue can be summed up in this paragraph from the article –

The cheerleaders in Kountze prompted a complaint to the school district in September when they rolled out banners with scriptural references, such as “I can do all things through Christ which strengthens me,” and “But thanks be to God which gives us victory through our Lord Jesus Christ.”

This activity prompted the following response from a group who filed the legal complaint against the cheerleaders –

The foundation argued that when the religious sentiments are displayed by cheerleaders in school uniforms before large groups of students at official school functions, the banners violate the constitutional separation of church and state.

Now – for this article – I’m not getting into the separation of church and state issue – whether it’s constitutional or not – or even whether it’s desirable or not. Maybe some other day.

No – the issue here relates to the quote about The Great Divorce –

The gates of Hell are locked from the inside.

The name of the group filing the complaint –

The freedom from religion foundation.

When going to see what their purpose is – one sees the following –

The purposes of the Freedom From Religion Foundation, Inc., as stated in its bylaws, are to promote the constitutional principle of separation of state and church, and to educate the public on matters relating to nontheism.

Since doesn’t even have a definition of the word “nontheism” – we turn to instead to find out exactly what this means.

Nontheism is a term that covers a range of both religious and nonreligious attitudes characterized by the absence of—or the rejection of— theism or any belief in a personal god or gods. It is in use in the fields of Christian apologetics and general liberal theology. “Nontheism” should not be confused with ” irreligion”.

Non-theism has various types. “Strong atheism” is the positive belief that a god does not exist. Someone who does not think about the existence of a deity may be termed “weakly atheistic”, or more specifically implicit atheism). Other, more qualified types of nontheism are often known as agnosticism, or more specifically explicit atheism. “Strong” or “positive” agnosticism is the belief that it is impossible for humans to know whether or not any deities exist. It is a more precise opinion than weak agnosticism, which is the belief that the existence or nonexistence of any deities is unknown but not necessarily unknowable. Philosopher Anthony Kenny distinguishes between agnostics, who find the claim “God exists” uncertain, and theological noncognitivists, who consider all God-talk to be meaningless.

That’s certainly a mouthful.
But what does it mean?

Invented originally as a synonym for secularism (see below), it has become an umbrella term for summarizing various distinct and even mutually exclusive positions united by a naturalist approach, sometimes in the plural, nontheisms.

Oh.  By itself, it doesn’t specifically mean anything in particular. One has to dig deeper to find out the context – and from there it’s hopefully possible to see what any one individual person or group means by nontheism.

Well – let’s dig deeper.

On entering their website – one sees a picture of what an atheist family looks like. That tells us something.

In their FAQ section – we read –

The Foundation recognizes that the United States was first among nations to adopt a secular Constitution. The founders who wrote the U.S. Constitution wanted citizens to be free to support the church of their choice, or no religion at all. Our Constitution was very purposefully written as a godless document, whose only references to religion are exclusionary.

This statement is true – in and of itself. The site also goes on to talk about the role of Thomas Jefferson as far as keeping a separation between church and state. One would get the impression that Jefferson was anti-God.

However – this is the very same Thomas Jefferson who drafted the Declaration of Independence which starts with the following –

When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature’s God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.

And ends with –

We, therefore, the Representatives of the united States of America, in General Congress, Assembled, appealing to the Supreme Judge of the world for the rectitude of our intentions, do, in the Name, and by Authority of the good People of these Colonies, solemnly publish and declare, That these United Colonies are, and of Right ought to be Free and Independent States; that they are Absolved from all Allegiance to the British Crown, and that all political connection between them and the State of Great Britain, is and ought to be totally dissolved; and that as Free and Independent States, they have full Power to levy War, conclude Peace, contract Alliances, establish Commerce, and to do all other Acts and Things which Independent States may of right do. And for the support of this Declaration, with a firm reliance on the protection of divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our Lives, our Fortunes and our sacred Honor.

This indicates to me not a godless person – but one who relies very heavily on God.

The thing is –
different people can look at the same thing
but still draw very different conclusions.

The folks at The Freedom From Religion Foundation certainly have their beliefs –
and likely hold them very strongly.
They also want to force them on everyone else –
and are willing to file suit to do so.

Question –

Is the person who believes so strongly that there is no God likely to react very much differently than the fictional person in The Great Divorce?
One of the things that C. S. Lewis points out is that being in Hell has the capability of driving people deeper and deeper into it – not giving them a desire to get out of it. One of the memorable examples of this is Napoleon –

Would they get to the bus stop in time, if they ever set out?’

‘Well—theoretically. But it’d be a distance of light-years. And they wouldn’t want to by now: not those old chaps like Tamberlaine and Genghis Khan, or Julius Caesar, or Henry the Fifth.’

‘Wouldn’t want to?’

‘That’s right. The nearest of those old ones is Napoleon. We know that because two chaps made the journey to see him. They’d started long before I came, of course, but I was there when they came back. About fifteen thousand years of our time it took them. We’ve picked out the house by now. Just a little pin prick of light and nothing else near it for millions of miles.’

‘But they got there?’

‘That’s right. He’d built himself a huge house all in the Empire style—rows of windows flaming with light, though it only shows as a pin prick from where I live.’

‘Did they see Napoleon?’

‘That’s right. They went up and looked through one of the windows. Napoleon was there all right.’

‘What was he doing?’

‘Walking up and down—up and down all the time—left-right, left-right—never stopping for a moment. The two chaps watched him for about a year and he never rested. And muttering to himself all the time. “It was Soult’s fault. It was Ney’s fault. It was Josephine’s fault. It was the fault of the Russians. It was the fault of the English.” Like that all the time. Never stopped for a moment. A little, fat man and he looked kind of tired. But he didn’t seem able to stop it.’

And therein lies the problem for people who –
in this short life on earth –
choose to

•  Not have time for God
•  Ignore God
•  Reject God
•  Deny God

or any of the other things that cause us to not accept Him.

Too long doing this will bring us to the point where we won’t even allow ourselves to consider the possibility of accepting Him – even when He’s right before our eyes.


Update to court case

Here we are now – more than two years later, and this case is still making its way through the Texas court system.  It is at the Texas state supreme court now.  Has been there since June 9, 2014.  So it took some time to even get there since the first article was written.  If you’re into this kind of thing, you can read all the gory details on the Texas Courts Web Site.  Most of the items on the court calendar and most of the documents are related to filing extensions for one reason or another.  There were also a couple entries when Senators Ted Cruz and John Cornyn entered the proceedings as Amicus Curiae.  I could never be a lawyer.  I’d be going crazy over the amount of time it takes to do anything.

Anyway – here’s part of what’s in the document from the Senators –

Senators John Cornyn and Ted Cruz represent the State of Texas in the
United States Senate. The Senators have a direct interest in protecting the
constitutional rights of their 26 million constituents, including their right under the
First Amendment to express their religious views.
As described in the petition for review filed by the cheerleaders, this case
presents fundamental issues about Texans’ constitutional right to freedom of
speech and religious expression, as well as the boundaries of the government-speech
doctrine. Because of the substantial importance of the case to the First
Amendment rights of their constituents, the Senators submitted an amicus brief in
the court of appeals supporting the cheerleaders. For the Court’s reference, a copy
of the Senators’ amicus brief filed below is enclosed as an appendix to this letter.

Now – does any of this sound familiar?  Isn’t it very much like the excerpt from The Great Divorce?  

Different people – looking at the same thing – and coming away with totally different views.

And look at the time spent.  I’d hate to see the amount of money spent on this.  We’re talking high school cheerleaders holding up banners.  And we’ve got lawyers, organizations, U S Senators, and who knows who else involved in this.  For years!  These high school cheerleaders will have graduated from college before this thing ends.  Maybe some will even have their own kids as high school cheerleaders holding up those same kinds of banners.  Still waiting for a decision.

While the lawyers and organizations are walking back and forth in the hallways of the courts talking to themselves, standing in front of the judges giving their views, having expensive dinners with supporters funding “the cause”, all the while complaining about whose fault all of this is.

Sound familiar?

Before they know it, some of these people – maybe even some of the ones who support the cheerleaders – are sitting on the bus having this conversation –

‘This is simply ridiculous,’ said a voice in my ear. One of the quieter and more respectable ghosts had sidled up to me. ‘There must be some mismanagement,’ he continued. ‘What’s the sense of allowing all that riff-raff to float about here all day? Look at them. They’re not enjoying it. They’d be far happier at home. They don’t even know what to do.’

‘I don’t know very well myself,’ said I. ‘What does one do?’

 Some of the people will be in that conversation because they never wanted to have anything to do with God in the first place – and they’re hoping the court will finally rule in favor of the freedom from religion folks..

Some will be in it because, even though they originally supported the cheerleaders, they got so focused on the court case and “the principle of the thing”, that they totally lost sight of the God they originally set out to “defend”.

Others will be in the conversation because they watched the first two groups of people fighting over a bunch of “silly banners”, and decided they didn’t want to have anything to do with either of those groups.  And yet – somehow –
here they all are in the same bus,
having the same conversation, 
with each other!

How did this happen?


So – Can you see, in a sense – The gates of Hell really are locked from the inside?

Some questions for everyone.

First – which side of the gates are you on?  Are you sure?  Have you really taken a look at yourself?  Where is your heart?  What do you spend your time on?  What’s important to you?  What are you thinking about when you’re mind isn’t actively thinking about something specific?

Second – especially for those of us who think we’re on the outside, and Heaven bound – when we think we have the appropriate answers to the previous questions – would someone looking at us reach the same conclusion?  Would someone look at us and say that they’d like to be “like us”?  Would they want to go to the Heaven that we are projecting to them by way of the life we lead?  Or are we turning people off, because we say one thing – and do something very different?

Yes – it’s important to realize the gates of Hell are locked from the inside.  And we are the ones that locked them and threw away the key.

It’s also important to really know which side of the gate we’re on.  What if we think we’re locking ourselves out of Hell?  But we’re actually locking ourselves in?  Because the goal isn’t to stay our of Hell.  It’s to follow Jesus into Heaven.

I fear it’s far to easy to be like Napoleon.  And never realize it.  Ever.

Mt 7:13 “Enter through the narrow gate. For wide is the gate and broad is the road that leads to destruction, and many enter through it. 14 But small is the gate and narrow the road that leads to life, and only a few find it.

 Which gate are you at?
And which side of the gate are you on?


Please leave a comment - it's nice to hear from you