Fighting Islamic Terrorists – diplomacy or weapons?

Diplomacy or weapons.  I get so tired of hearing these choices – like they are all we have.

Conservatives say – the number one job of the government is to protect it’s people by killing the enemy.
Liberals say – negotiate – war doesn’t solve anything.
(yes – these are generalizations.  please recognize that.)

But there are problems with both.

In the case of Islamic terrorists –

my main question for the liberals is – how do you negotiate with someone who wants to kill you?  I mean, really, is there a middle ground between life and death that one can negotiate to?

my main questions for the conservatives is – do you really think you can kill all of them?

The problem with negotiating with someone who wants to kill you

Seriously – how can you negotiate with someone who’s religion (at least their interpretation of it – whether it be theologically right or wrong) says they must kill you in order to be guaranteed a spot in paradise?  Do you really think they’re going to give up their version of Heaven – and let you live?  If you’re on the opposite side from them, and you look like a ticket to paradise, trust me, they care a whole lot more about killing you than anything else.  And probably a whole lot more than you care about anything at all.  They’ll lie, cheat, steal, whatever – to get that spot in paradise.  If you believed as fervently as they do – you would do the same.

The problem with killing the enemy

This isn’t like wars that we’ve fought for territory, or to take out a dictator.  This is religion.  A religion that’s been around for 1600 years.  On top of that, it claims to be the “corrected” version of previous religions – Judaism and Christianity.  Even to the point where the terrorists believe their mission in life is to kill the infidels.  One thing that we should have learned from experience – it’s just not possible to wipe out a religion.  This flavor of Islam has come up before – been “defeated” before – and continues to come back.  In an odd way, Obama’s “strategy” of degrade and destroy is half right.  His objective seems to be degrade – and let the next president try to destroy.  Maybe he does understand that destroy is impossible – so he’s selected the only achievable option – degrade.  Then he can maybe claim success.  At degrading.


Discover more from God versus religion

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Please leave a comment or ask a question - it's nice to hear from you.

Scroll to Top